On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 11:01 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> My guess is that PGDLLIMPORT has been added explicitly when somebody needed
> it for something, without any actual thought. I can't say I see any reason
> not to export the other ones as well -- more that maybe there are even more
> that are needed?

Yes, more or less. The reasoning behind at least the PostmasterPID bit is that:
That resulted in cac83219.

The other ones could perhaps be marked with PGDLLIMPORT. Now usually
we need a use-case behind this change, and there are not that many
hackers on Windows doing much plugin development.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to