* Michael Paquier wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Christian Ullrich > <ch...@chrullrich.net> wrote: >> I also did a debug build with 1+2+4 that came in at 84 μs/iteration. > > Moved to next CF. Christian, perhaps this patch should have an extra > round of reviews?
It is significantly different from the last version, so yes, of course. -- Christian -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers