* Michael Paquier wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Christian Ullrich
> <ch...@chrullrich.net> wrote:
>> I also did a debug build with 1+2+4 that came in at 84 μs/iteration.
> Moved to next CF. Christian, perhaps this patch should have an extra
> round of reviews?

It is significantly different from the last version, so yes, of course.


Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to