On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
> Michael Paquier <[email protected]> writes:
>> Would it be better to return NULL instead then.
>
> That would likely just result in application core dumps.
> See notes for commit 490cb21f7.

That's 40cb21f7 actually. Thanks for the pointer.

> I think we've established an expectation
> that only a NULL argument will elicit a NULL return from PQhost.

OK, the current behavior wins then.
-- 
Michael


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to