On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes:
>> Would it be better to return NULL instead then.
> That would likely just result in application core dumps.
> See notes for commit 490cb21f7.

That's 40cb21f7 actually. Thanks for the pointer.

> I think we've established an expectation
> that only a NULL argument will elicit a NULL return from PQhost.

OK, the current behavior wins then.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to