On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes: >> Would it be better to return NULL instead then. > > That would likely just result in application core dumps. > See notes for commit 490cb21f7.
That's 40cb21f7 actually. Thanks for the pointer. > I think we've established an expectation > that only a NULL argument will elicit a NULL return from PQhost. OK, the current behavior wins then. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
