Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2016-12-01 14:43:04 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: >> I get that, but this is the second time in very recent history that >> I've broken something because there was code that wasn't compiled or >> tests that weren't run by 'make check-world'.
> Well, I don't quite know what the alternative is. For some reason, which > I don't quite understand personally, people care about security during > regression tests runs. So we can't run the test automatedly. And nobody > has added a buildfarm module to run it manually on their servers either > :( I don't think there's much substitute for knowing what tests we have available. In the particular case at hand, I wonder if we could generate new test certificates every time (or at least have an option to do that) rather than relying on premade ones. But I don't think it's realistic to imagine that check-world will ever automatedly invoke every possible test. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers