Junseok Yang wrote: > Hello hackers, > > I met SIGSEGV when using `array_position()` with record type > arguments, so I've written a patch which corrects this problem. It > seems that `array_position...()` sets wrong memory context for the > cached function (in this case `record_eq()`) which is used to find a > matching element.
Looks correct to me, so pushed to all affected branches. > The problem is reproducable with the following query. > > SELECT array_position(ids, (1, 1)) > FROM (VALUES (ARRAY[(0, 0)]), (ARRAY[(1, 1)])) AS _(ids); I used this as a new regression test. Thanks for the report and patch! -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
