Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmm as for PREPAREd statements, it seems much better to
> implement functions which returns fields info for the
> statement than relying on such a protocol level change.

Well, we're changing the protocol anyway for other purposes, so the
extra burden of a change here doesn't seem large.  I think it's more
useful to worry about what functionality we want than to worry about
whether it's changed...

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to