> > I suggested using names to Tom for this reason, but he preferred to use > > attrelid/attnum. > > Oh, and what happenned to the attlognum idea? If something that needs > it is going to be implemented the column should probably be added now > and used instead of attnum.
Weeeell, it'd be nice, but I can see ways of doing ALTER COLUMN/SET TYPE without it, so... (My work on that has been stalled for a while BTW, due to sheer difficulty!) Chris ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
