On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've got no problem with that at all, but I want to unbreak things > more or less immediately and then you/we can further improve it later.
Committed, although I realize now that doesn't fix Dilip's problem, only my (somewhat different) problem. To fix his issue, we need something like your 0001. Are you going to polish that up soon here? I kinda want to get the regressions we've introduced fixed here. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers