On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 02:00:46PM +0300, Stas Kelvich wrote: > > > On 27 Sep 2016, at 03:30, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > OK. I am marking this patch as returned with feedback then. Looking > > forward to seeing the next investigations.. At least this review has > > taught us one thing or two. > > So, here is brand new implementation of the same thing. > > Now instead of creating pgproc entry for prepared transaction during recovery, > I just store recptr/xid correspondence in separate 2L-list and deleting > entries in that > list if redo process faced commit/abort. In case of checkpoint or end of > recovery > transactions remaining in that list are dumped to files in pg_twophase. > > Seems that current approach is way more simpler and patch has two times less > LOCs then previous one.
Uh, did you mean to attached patch here? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers