On 2016-12-17 15:30:08 -0800, David Fetter wrote: > On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 05:54:04PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 07:41:50AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 6:42 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > > > Uh, did you mean to attached patch here? > > > > > > Strange. I can confirm that I have received the patch as attached, but > > > it is not on the archives. > > > > It must have been stripped by our email system. You were a direct > > CC so you received it. > > I was neither, and I received it, so I don't thing PostgreSQL's email > system stripped it. It's pretty mystifying, though.
The mime construction in the email is weird. The attachement is below a multipart/alternative and multipart/mixed, besides the text/html version of the plain text email. Because the attachement is below the multipart/alternative (i.e. the switch between plain text / html), it'll not be considered a proper attachement by many mail readers. It seems quite borked to put an attachement there - weird that apple mail does so. Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers