On 2016/12/17 10:40, Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >>> On 12/16/16 11:05 AM, Robert Haas wrote: >>>> If we were going to do anything about this, >>>> my vote would be to remove sql_inheritance. >> >>> Go for it. >> >>> Let's also remove the table* syntax then. >> >> Meh --- that might break existing queries, to what purpose? >> >> We certainly shouldn't remove query syntax without a deprecation period. >> I'm less concerned about that for GUCs. > > I agree. Patch attached, just removing the GUC and a fairly minimal > amount of the supporting infrastructure.
+1 to removing the sql_inheritance GUC. The patch looks good to me. Thanks, Amit -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
