On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:25 AM, Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >> I agree. Patch attached, just removing the GUC and a fairly minimal >> amount of the supporting infrastructure. > > +1 to removing the sql_inheritance GUC. The patch looks good to me.
Great, committed. I realize just now that I forgot to credit anyone as a reviewer, but hopefully nobody's going to mind that too much considering this is a purely mechanical patch I wrote in 20 minutes. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
