On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 3:28 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
> I do think this has the potential for negative performance
> implications. Consider code like
> /* skip over the page header */
> if (CurrPos % XLogSegSize == 0)
> {
> CurrPos += SizeOfXLogLongPHD;
> currpos += SizeOfXLogLongPHD;
> }
> else
> right now that's doable in an efficient manner, because XLogSegSize is
> constant. If it's a variable and the compiler doesn't even know it's a
> power-of-two, it'll have to do a full "div" - and that's quite easily
> noticeable in a lot of cases.
>
> Now it could entirely be that the costs of this will be swamped by
> everything else, but I'd not want to rely on it.
We could use the GUC assign hook to compute a mask and a shift, so
that this could be written as (CurrPos & mask_variable) == 0. That
would avoid the division instruction, though not the memory access. I
hope this is all in the noise, though. I know this is code is hot but
I think it'll be hard to construct a test case where the bottleneck is
anything other than the speed at which the disk can absorb bytes. I
suppose we could set fsync=off and put the whole cluster on a RAMDISK
to avoid those bottlenecks, but of course no real storage system
behaves like that.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
