On 12/23/16 10:24 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: >> While it's not a particularly good idea to set it to 1s on a production >> system, I don't see why we need to prevent that. It's not like 30s is >> likely to be a good idea either. > >> Hence I'd like to set the lower limit to 1s. > > OK, but the documentation for it needs some work if you're going to > do that. It only warns against making the timeout too large, not > too small.
+1 for the lower limit and the docs. -- -David da...@pgmasters.net -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
