2016-12-26 18:49 GMT+03:00 Dmitry Dolgov <[email protected]>: >> On 5 December 2016 at 12:03, Haribabu Kommi <[email protected]> >> wrote: > >> Moved to next CF with "needs review" status. > > Looks like we stuck here little bit. Does anyone else have any > suggestions/improvements, or this patch is in good enough shape?
Would you rebase the patch, please? It seems it is necessary. It can't be applied now. -- Artur Zakirov Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com Russian Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
