As I mentioned above [1] in my humble opinion this patch is not at all in a "good shape" until it breaks existing extensions.
[1] http://postgr.es/m/20161115080324.GA5351%40e733.localdomain On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 10:49:30PM +0700, Dmitry Dolgov wrote: > > On 5 December 2016 at 12:03, Haribabu Kommi <kommi.harib...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Moved to next CF with "needs review" status. > > Looks like we stuck here little bit. Does anyone else have any > suggestions/improvements, or this patch is in good enough shape? -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
