On 5 January 2017 at 08:35, Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 5 January 2017 at 01:49, Fabien COELHO <coe...@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote: >> >>> ok understand >> >> >> Good. So we seem to agree that GUCS are transactional? > > No. We don't agree. They aren't.
Uh. I take that back. craig=> SET x.s = 'x'; SET craig=> BEGIN; BEGIN craig=> SET x.s = 'y'; SET craig=> ROLLBACK; ROLLBACK craig=> SHOW x.s; x.s ----- x (1 row) I'm surprised, I never knew this. -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
