On 5 January 2017 at 08:35, Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 5 January 2017 at 01:49, Fabien COELHO <coe...@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote:
>>> ok understand
>> Good. So we seem to agree that GUCS are transactional?
> No. We don't agree. They aren't.
Uh. I take that back.
craig=> SET x.s = 'x';
craig=> SET x.s = 'y';
craig=> SHOW x.s;
I'm surprised, I never knew this.
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: