The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world: tested, failed
Implements feature: tested, passed
Spec compliant: tested, passed
Documentation: tested, passed
(Though I could not check "make installcheck-world" as passed because it failed
1 test, I think it basically SHOULD pass - see my comment below.)
Patch looks good to me and does what we talked about, and Docs seem clear and
correct.
I was able to build Postgres and run pg_ctl and observe that it waited by
default for the 'start' action, which addresses my original concern.
`make` and `make install` went fine, and `make check` did as well, but `make
installcheck-world` said (after a while):
=======================
1 of 55 tests failed.
=======================
The diff summary is here:
***
/home/my_secret_local_username/my/secret/path/to/postgres/src/interfaces/ecpg/test/expected/connect-test5.stderr
2016-08-23 10:00:53.000000000 -0500
---
/home/my_secret_local_username/my/secret/path/to/postgres/src/interfaces/ecpg/test/results/connect-test5.stderr
2017-01-06 00:08:40.000000000 -0600
***************
*** 36,42 ****
[NO_PID]: sqlca: code: 0, state: 00000
[NO_PID]: ECPGconnect: opening database <DEFAULT> on <DEFAULT> port <DEFAULT>
for user regress_ecpg_user2
[NO_PID]: sqlca: code: 0, state: 00000
! [NO_PID]: ECPGconnect: could not open database: FATAL: database
"regress_ecpg_user2" does not exist
[NO_PID]: sqlca: code: 0, state: 00000
[NO_PID]: ecpg_finish: connection main closed
--- 36,42 ----
[NO_PID]: sqlca: code: 0, state: 00000
[NO_PID]: ECPGconnect: opening database <DEFAULT> on <DEFAULT> port <DEFAULT>
for user regress_ecpg_user2
[NO_PID]: sqlca: code: 0, state: 00000
! [NO_PID]: ECPGconnect: could not open database: FATAL: database
"my_secret_local_username" does not exist
[NO_PID]: sqlca: code: 0, state: 00000
[NO_PID]: ecpg_finish: connection main closed
***************
*** 73,79 ****
[NO_PID]: sqlca: code: -220, state: 08003
[NO_PID]: ECPGconnect: opening database <DEFAULT> on <DEFAULT> port <DEFAULT>
for user regress_ecpg_user2
[NO_PID]: sqlca: code: 0, state: 00000
! [NO_PID]: ECPGconnect: could not open database: FATAL: database
"regress_ecpg_user2" does not exist
[NO_PID]: sqlca: code: 0, state: 00000
[NO_PID]: ecpg_finish: connection main closed
--- 73,79 ----
[NO_PID]: sqlca: code: -220, state: 08003
[NO_PID]: ECPGconnect: opening database <DEFAULT> on <DEFAULT> port <DEFAULT>
for user regress_ecpg_user2
[NO_PID]: sqlca: code: 0, state: 00000
! [NO_PID]: ECPGconnect: could not open database: FATAL: database
"my_secret_local_username" does not exist
[NO_PID]: sqlca: code: 0, state: 00000
[NO_PID]: ecpg_finish: connection main closed
======================================================================
I don't actually believe this to indicate a problem though - I think perhaps
there's a problem with this test, or with how I am running it. The only diff
was that when it (correctly) complained of a nonexistent database, it referred
to my username that I was logged in as, instead of the test database name
"regress_ecpg_user2". I don't think this has anything to do with the changes
to pg_ctl.
I could be wrong though! I am going to leave this as "Needs review" until
someone more familiar with the project double-checks this.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
