Hi Keith, On 2017/01/06 2:16, Keith Fiske wrote: > Could we get some clarification on the partition_bound_spec portion of the > PARTITION OF clause? Just doing some testing it seems it's inclusive of the > FROM value but exclusive of the TO value. I don't see mention of this in > the docs as of commit 18fc5192a631441a73e6a3b911ecb14765140389 yesterday. > It does mention that the values aren't allowed to overlap, but looking at > the schema below, without the clarification of which side is > inclusive/exclusive it seems confusing because 2016-08-01 is in both. Even > the child table does not clarify this. Not sure if there's a way to do this > in the \d+ display which would be ideal, but it should at least be > mentioned in the docs.
I agree that needs highlighting. I'm planning to write a doc patch for that (among other documentation improvements). Thanks, Amit -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers