On 1/6/17 10:15 AM, Feike Steenbergen wrote:
On 6 January 2017 at 15:42, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net
<mailto:mag...@hagander.net>> wrote:
Is there actual value in providing both %p and %f? It's not like it's
really hard to do, but since the path will be specified on the same
commandline, you could just put it in the command?
As %f can be determined from %p I don't mind that much. However, having
a single static --whatever command may be very useful for configuration
management or backup tools that want to use static commands.
The other reason why I'd offer both is to have some uniformity with
archive_command, possibly allowing some reuse of code.
Agreed. Currently pgBackRest only accepts %p for archive_command
because it already knows where $PGDATA is. Of course I can change that,
but I think it makes sense to keep command options uniform anyway.
--
-David
da...@pgmasters.net
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
