On 1/5/17 4:56 PM, Michael Banck wrote: >> You can't actually change the other two without changing wal_level. > That actually goes both ways: I recently saw a server not start cause we > were experimenting with temporarily setting wal_level to minimal for > initial bulk loading, but did not reduce max_wal_senders back to zero. > So it failed at startup with 'FATAL: WAL streaming (max_wal_senders > > 0) requires wal_level "replica" or "logical"'.
I think that was the point: You can't change the default of max_wal_senders without also changing the default of wal_level. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers