2017-01-08 3:31 GMT+01:00 Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com>:

> On 1/7/17 5:39 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> I checked current implementation of FOUND variable. If we introduce new
>> auto variable ROW_COUNT - exactly like FOUND, then it doesn't introduce
>> any compatibility break.
> Except it would break every piece of code that had a row_count variable,
> though I guess you could see which scoping level the variable had been
> defined in.
> I think the right solution in this case is to replace GET DIAGNOSTICs with
> something easier to use, but I'm not sure what that would be.

I invite any ideas?



> I think this is another example of where not using some kind of character
> to distinguish variables screws us. :/

> --
> Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
> Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
> Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
> 855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)

Reply via email to