> >> Related to that, I suspect we could add better support to existing >> commands for at least some of these things. For example, SELECT ... INTO >> NOMULTI (instead of STRICT) to indicate that multiple rows are an error but >> missing data is > > > Another flag into NOMULTI can be solution too. > > The new syntax ":=" has some advantages: > > 1. it robust against type - it is harder to do unwanted swap of variables, > and this mistake is very clear >
should be "against typo", sorry Pavel > 2. the syntax ensure equality of target variables and source expressions. > >> >> >
