On 1/10/17 3:06 PM, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Magnus Hagander (mag...@hagander.net) wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 8:03 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I may be outvoted, but I'm still not in favor of changing the default >>> wal_level. That caters only to people who lack sufficient foresight >>> to know that they need a replica before the system becomes so critical >>> that they can't bounce it to update the configuration. >> >> True. But the current level only caters to those people who run large ETL >> jobs without doing any tuning on their system (at least none that would >> require a restart), or another one of the fairly specific workloads. >> >> And as I keep re-iterating, it's not just about replicas, it's also about >> the ability to make proper backups. Which is a pretty fundamental feature. >> >> I do think you are outvoted, yes :) At least that's the result of my >> tallying up the people who have spoken out on the thread. > > I tend to agree with Magnus on this, being able to perform an online > backup is pretty darn important. Agreed and +1. -- -David da...@pgmasters.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
