On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 2:09 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 10:06 AM, David Steele <da...@pgmasters.net> > wrote: > > On 1/10/17 3:06 PM, Stephen Frost wrote: > >> * Magnus Hagander (mag...@hagander.net) wrote: > >>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 8:03 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >>>> I may be outvoted, but I'm still not in favor of changing the default > >>>> wal_level. That caters only to people who lack sufficient foresight > >>>> to know that they need a replica before the system becomes so critical > >>>> that they can't bounce it to update the configuration. > >>> > >>> True. But the current level only caters to those people who run large > ETL > >>> jobs without doing any tuning on their system (at least none that would > >>> require a restart), or another one of the fairly specific workloads. > >>> > >>> And as I keep re-iterating, it's not just about replicas, it's also > about > >>> the ability to make proper backups. Which is a pretty fundamental > feature. > >>> > >>> I do think you are outvoted, yes :) At least that's the result of my > >>> tallying up the people who have spoken out on the thread. > >> > >> I tend to agree with Magnus on this, being able to perform an online > >> backup is pretty darn important. > > > > Agreed and +1. > > +1'ing. > I've pushed this. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
