On 1/11/17 5:27 AM, Simon Riggs wrote: > The main area of "design doubt" remains the implementation of the > recovery_target parameter set. Are we happy with the user interface > choices in the patch, given the understanding that the situation was > more comple than at first thought?
Could you summarize the current proposal(s)? Personally, I don't immediately see the need to change anything from the parameter names that I currently see in recovery.conf.sample. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
