On 1/13/17 9:45 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 1/12/17 9:43 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 10:17:52AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >>> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >>>> In 9.5, the default pg_ctl stop mode was changed from "smart" to "fast". >>>> In pg_upgrade, there is this code: >>>> ... >>>> I think the last line should be changed to something like >>>> fast ? "-m fast" : "-m smart"); >>> >>> Ugh. Clear oversight. >>> >>> There is maybe room for a separate discussion about whether pg_upgrade >>> *should* be using fast mode, but if so we could remove the "bool fast" >>> argument from this function altogether. >> >> Agreed, it should be remove. Should I do it? > > For 9.5 and 9.6, I think we should backpatch what I suggested above, to > minimize the behavior change.
I have committed that (including to master). > For master we can consider removing the > distinction and just use fast shutdown all the time, but I haven't > checked all the possible implications of that change. I'm not planning to work on this at this time. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
