On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 19:27:40 -0300 Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Karl O. Pinc wrote: > > > @@ -511,10 +519,16 @@ int > > SysLogger_Start(void) > > { > > pid_t sysloggerPid; > > - char *filename; > > > > + /* > > + * Logging collector is not enabled. We don't know where > > messages are > > + * logged. Remove outdated file holding the current log > > filenames. > > + */ > > if (!Logging_collector) > > + { > > + unlink(LOG_METAINFO_DATAFILE); > > return 0; > > + } > > I thought this part was odd -- I mean, why is SysLogger_Start() being > called if the collector is not enabled? Turns out we do it and return > early if not enabled. But not in all cases -- there is one callsite > in postmaster.c that avoids the call if the collector is disabled. > That needs to be changed if we want this to work reliably. Is this an argument for having the current_logfiles always exist and be empty when there is no in-filesystem logfile? It always felt to me that the code would be simpler that way. Karl <k...@meme.com> Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward." -- Robert A. Heinlein -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers