A couple things occurred to me after hitting "Send".

In addition to the prior 2 points:

(3)  The documentation for max_pred_locks_per_relation needs a fix.
Both page locks and tuple locks for the relation are counted toward
the limit.

In releases prior to this patch, max_pred_locks_per_relation was
calculated as "max_pred_locks_per_transaction / 2".  I know that
people have sometimes increased max_pred_locks_per_transaction
specifically to raise the limit on locks within a relation before
the promotion to relation granularity occurs.  It seems kinda
anti-social not to support a special value for continuing that
behavior or, if we don't want to do that, at least modifying
pg_upgrade to set max_pred_locks_per_relation to the value that was
in effect in the old version.  In any event, it seems more like
autovacuum_work_mem or autovacuum_vacuum_cost_limit than like
effective_cache_size.

Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to