David Rowley <david.row...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 19 January 2017 at 11:06, David Rowley <david.row...@2ndquadrant.com> > wrote: > > Old patch no longer applies, so I've attached a rebased patch. This > > also re-adds a comment line which I mistakenly removed. > > (meanwhile Andres commits 69f4b9c) > > I should've waited a bit longer. > > Here's another that fixes the new conflicts.
I suspect that "inner" and "outer" relation / tuple are sometimes confused in comments: * analyzejoins.c:70 "searches for subsequent matching outer tuples." * analyzejoins.c:972 /* * innerrel_is_unique * Check for proofs which prove that 'innerrel' can, at most, match a * single tuple in 'outerrel' based on the join condition in * 'restrictlist'. */ * relation.h:1831 bool inner_unique; /* inner side of join matches no more than one * outer side tuple */ -- Antonin Houska Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH Gröhrmühlgasse 26 A-2700 Wiener Neustadt Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de, http://www.cybertec.at -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers