On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 1/18/17 2:32 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Unless we can find something official, I suppose we should just
>> display BASE TABLE in that case as we do in other cases.  I wonder if
>> the schema needs some broader revision; for example, are there
>> information_schema elements intended to show information about
>> partitions?
> Is it intentional that we show the partitions by default in \d,
> pg_tables, information_schema.tables?  Or should we treat those as
> somewhat-hidden details?

I'm not really sure what the right thing to do is there.  I was hoping
you had an opinion.

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to