Hi,
Synthetic PG workload or real world production workload?
Both might work, production-like has bigger pull, but I'd guess
synthetic is good enough.
Thanks! The box should get PostgreSQL in the not too distant future.
It'll get a backup from prod, but will act as new prod, so it might take
some time until a job can be run and a profile collected.
So how would I do a perf profile that would be acceptable as prove?
You'd have to look at cpu time, not number of syscalls. IIRC I
suggested doing a cycles profile with -g and then using "perf report
--children" to see how many cycles are spent somewhere below lseek.
Understood. Either profile manually or expand the function.
I'd also suggest sharing a profile cycles profile, it's quite likely
that the overhead is completely elsewhere.
Yeah, could be. It'll be interesting to see for sure. I should get a
chance to collect such profile and then I'll post it back here -
/Tobias
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
