Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes: > * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: >> What I think might be worth considering is inserting underscores, >> eg "pg_receive_wal", anywhere that we are running the abbreviation >> directly against another word. We won't get another chance.
> Wouldn't that make it 'pg_recv_wal'? Or were you referring to the 'wal' > as being the abbreviation? The latter. As far as the programs go, that would be pg_receive_wal pg_reset_wal pg_wal_dump The other cases you mention are, for the most part, words that we're running together ("db" is the only exception) so they're not committing double sins against readability. Anyway, I'm not suggesting that we should rename anything this patch isn't touching already. regards, tom lane PS: I'm trying hard not to open the can of worms labeled "pg_dump_wal". -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers