Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > Yeah, I thought about that, too, but it doesn't really seem worth it. > If we had pg_receive_wal and pg_receive_logical, they'd be nicely > consistent with each other, but inconsistent with practically every > other utility we have: pg_basebackup, pg_archivecleanup, > pg_controldata, etc.
Mmm, good point. I was looking at pg_test_fsync and pg_test_timing, but those are the only exceptions, and they're only quasi-user-facing anyway. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers