Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > It is really quite annoying that the buildfarm doesn't do what stock > > tests do. What about pushing a bit stronger for having these > > optimizations as part of the standard build run, instead of being only > > in the buildfarm client script? > > Huh? It's just a question of "make check" vs "make installcheck". > They each have their uses.
The current problem is because the buildfarm uses a different database. See https://postgr.es/m/e6084b89-07a7-7e57-51ee-d7b8fc9ec...@2ndquadrant.com (When I wrote the para quoted above, I thought this was for performance, but now I realize it's not so. Anyway the point stands that buildfarm does things differently.) -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
