On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 7:29 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I've not done like the most careful review ever, but I'm in favor of the >>> general change (provided the byval thing is fixed obviously). >> >> Thanks for the review. > > Why not use pg_ltoa and pg_lltoa like the output functions for the datatype > do?
No particular reason. > Might use CStringGetTextDatum(blah) instead of > PointerGetDatum(cstring_to_text(blah)). Yes, thanks. -- Michael
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers