On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Beena Emerson <memissemer...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 11:09 PM, Beena Emerson <memissemer...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello,
>> > PFA the updated patches.
>> I've started reviewing the patches.
>> 01-add-XLogSegmentOffset-macro.patch looks clean to me. I'll post my
>> detailed review after looking into the second patch. But, both the
>> patches needs a rebase based on the commit 85c11324cabaddcfaf3347df7
>> (Rename user-facing tools with "xlog" in the name to say "wal").
>>
>>
>
> PFA the rebased patches.
>
>
> Hello,

The recent commit  c29aff959dc64f7321062e7f33d8c6ec23db53d has again
changed the code and the second patch cannot be applied cleanly. Please
find attached the rebased 02 patch. 01 patch is the same .



-- 
Thank you,

Beena Emerson

Have a Great Day!

Attachment: 01-add-XLogSegmentOffset-macro.patch
Description: Binary data

Attachment: 02-initdb-walsegsize-v2.patch
Description: Binary data

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to