On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Beena Emerson <memissemer...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello, > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 11:09 PM, Beena Emerson <memissemer...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > Hello, >> > PFA the updated patches. >> I've started reviewing the patches. >> 01-add-XLogSegmentOffset-macro.patch looks clean to me. I'll post my >> detailed review after looking into the second patch. But, both the >> patches needs a rebase based on the commit 85c11324cabaddcfaf3347df7 >> (Rename user-facing tools with "xlog" in the name to say "wal"). >> >> > > PFA the rebased patches. > > > Hello, The recent commit c29aff959dc64f7321062e7f33d8c6ec23db53d has again changed the code and the second patch cannot be applied cleanly. Please find attached the rebased 02 patch. 01 patch is the same . -- Thank you, Beena Emerson Have a Great Day!
01-add-XLogSegmentOffset-macro.patch
Description: Binary data
02-initdb-walsegsize-v2.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers