On 2017/01/31 6:57, Tomas Vondra wrote: > On 01/30/2017 09:37 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> Looks good to me. I don't think we need to keep the names very short -- >> I would propose "standistinct", "stahistogram", "stadependencies". >> > > Yeah, I got annoyed by the short names too. > > This however reminds me that perhaps pg_mv_statistic is not the best name. > I know others proposed pg_statistic_ext (and pg_stats_ext), and while I > wasn't a big fan initially, I think it's a better name. People generally > don't know what 'multivariate' means, while 'extended' is better known > (e.g. because Oracle uses it for similar stuff). > > So I think I'll switch to that name too.
+1 to pg_statistics_ext. Maybe, even pg_statistics_extended, however being that verbose may not be warranted. Thanks, Amit -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
