On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 2:30 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > "txn" can be used for abbreviation of "Transaction", so for example > pg_fdw_txn_resolver? > I'm also fine to change the module and function name.
If we're judging the relative clarity of various ways of abbreviating the word "transaction", "txn" surely beats "x". To repeat my usual refrain, is there any merit to abbreviating at all? Could we call it, say, "fdw_transaction_resolver" or "fdw_transaction_manager"? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
