On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 3:29 AM, Nikhil Sontakke <nikh...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>> Shouldn’t the singular part of the message above be: >>> "%u two-phase state file was written for a long-running prepared >>> transaction" >>> >>> But, then, English is not my native language, so I might be off here :-) >> >> If there's one file per long-running prepared transaction, which I >> think is true, then I agree with you. > > PFA, small patch to fix this, then.
Committed. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
