* Stephen Frost (sfr...@snowman.net) wrote: > Greetings, > > * Rushabh Lathia (rushabh.lat...@gmail.com) wrote: > > Commit c59a1a89035674c6efacc596d652528cebba37ec don't allow non-positive > > number > > of jobs. Now on 9.2 number of jobs get assigned to opts->number_of_jobs. If > > user don't specify any value -j then default value will be always 0. Which > > will > > lead to the "invalid number of parallel jobs" error. > > > > if (opts->number_of_jobs <= 0) > > { > > fprintf(stderr, _("%s: invalid number of parallel jobs\n"), > > progname); > > exit(1); > > } > > > > Please find attach patch to initialize default value for number of jobs to > > 1. > > Ugh. This is what I get for thinking that our regression tests actually > test even the basic things. > > That fix should go into NewRestoreOptions() where the other not-zero > settings go. > > I'll fix it here in a few.
Fix pushed. Thanks! Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature