On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 11:12:00AM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: David Fetter 2017-02-08 <20170208151214.ga8...@fetter.org> > > Would you be open to saving the next person some work by doing > > something similar to how \d is done, namely looking for an 'x' > > modifier after g without regard to how far after? As of this writing, > > the \d version starts at line 398 in master. > > I think that ship has sailed, given there's already \gset. > Supporting \g[optionset] next to it *now*, given no one knows how > "optionset" is going to evolve seems like premature optimization.
Good point. Thanks for looking it over. Best, David. -- David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
