On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 11:12:00AM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: David Fetter 2017-02-08 <20170208151214.ga8...@fetter.org>
> > Would you be open to saving the next person some work by doing
> > something similar to how \d is done, namely looking for an 'x'
> > modifier after g without regard to how far after?  As of this writing,
> > the \d version starts at line 398 in master.
> I think that ship has sailed, given there's already \gset.
> Supporting \g[optionset] next to it *now*, given no one knows how
> "optionset" is going to evolve seems like premature optimization.

Good point.  Thanks for looking it over.

David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to