* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > Also, our experience with contrib/tsearch2 suggests that the extension
> > shouldn't be part of contrib, because we have zero track record of getting
> > rid of stuff in contrib, no matter how dead it is.
> Let's nuke tsearch2 to remove this adverse precedent, and then add the
> new thing.
> Anybody who still wants tsearch2 can go get it from an old version, or
> somebody can maintain a fork on github.

Works for me.  I'd love to nuke pg_shadow and all the other
not-really-maintained backwards-compat things from when roles were
added too.



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to