On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 7:31 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinn...@iki.fi> wrote:

> On 02/10/2017 08:27 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> For me a killer feature would be if/when we can get to a point where we
>> can
>> have something pgxs-style on cmake that also works on windows.
>> Our homemade Windows build system works OK for postgres, and while ugly it
>> is as you say well tested by now. But it doesn't do *anything* to help
>> people build extensions on Windows.
> Do we need to build PostgreSQL itself using cmake, to achieve that? Could
> we write something like pgxs for cmake, only for extensions?
I guess we wouldn't, but we'd still need the "replacement for autoconf"
part. So then we're back to maintaining multiple buildsystems.

 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

Reply via email to