On 2017-02-22 00:10:35 -0600, Jim Nasby wrote: > On 2/20/17 5:04 AM, Andres Freund wrote: > > On 2017-02-20 11:58:12 +0100, Petr Jelinek wrote: > > > That being said, I did wonder myself if we should just deprecate float > > > timestamps as well. > > > > I think we need a proper deprecation period for that, given that the > > conversion away will be painful for pg_upgrade using people with big > > clusters. So I think we should fix this regardless... :( > > I wounder if a separate "floatstamp" data type might fit the bill there. It > might not be completely seamless, but it would be binary compatible.
I don't really see what'd that solve. - Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
