On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 2:44 AM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> wrote:
> I tend to be suspicious of use of the type "long" in general, because
> in general one should assume that it is no wider than "int". This
> calls into question why any code that uses "long" didn't just use
> "int", at least in my mind.

Yeah.  Using things that are guaranteed to be the size we want them to
be (and the same size on all platforms) seems like a good plan.

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to