On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Amit Langote
<langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Thanks for taking a look.  Hm, I think the second part seems to be
> needless duplication.  So, I changed it to match using TailMatches2("FOR",
> "VALUES") and kept just one instance of it.  The first part is matching
> and completing two different commands (ATTACH PARTITION partition_name and
> PARTITION OF parent_name), so that seems fine.

I agree.  Committed this version.

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to