On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > Thanks for taking a look. Hm, I think the second part seems to be > needless duplication. So, I changed it to match using TailMatches2("FOR", > "VALUES") and kept just one instance of it. The first part is matching > and completing two different commands (ATTACH PARTITION partition_name and > PARTITION OF parent_name), so that seems fine.
I agree. Committed this version. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers