On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 2/26/17 11:46, Robert Haas wrote: >> I don't see >> a solution other than launching a separate worker for each database, >> which seems like it could be extremely expensive if there are many >> databases. > > You don't have to start all these workers at once. Starting one and not > starting the next one until the first one is finished should be fine. > It will have the same serial behavior that the patch is proposing anyway.
Yeah, true. The constant factor is higher, of course. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers