On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 05:31:21PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes:
> > I don't object to the addition of this patch in next CF as this
> > presents no new concept. Still per the complications this patch and
> > because it is a complicated patch I was wondering if people are fine
> > to include it in this last CF.
> The March CF is already looking pretty daunting.  We can try to include
> this but I won't be too surprised if it gets punted to a future CF.

Yeah, that was my reaction too.

  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to