On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 05:31:21PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes: > > I don't object to the addition of this patch in next CF as this > > presents no new concept. Still per the complications this patch and > > because it is a complicated patch I was wondering if people are fine > > to include it in this last CF. > > The March CF is already looking pretty daunting. We can try to include > this but I won't be too surprised if it gets punted to a future CF.
Yeah, that was my reaction too. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
