On 2/28/17 11:21 AM, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
The only downside I can see to this approach is that we no logner will able to reindex catalog tables concurrently, but in return it should be easier to confirm that this approach can be made work.
Another downside is any stored regclass fields will become invalid. Admittedly that's a pretty unusual use case, but it'd be nice if there was at least a way to let users fix things during the rename phase (perhaps via an event trigger).
-- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com 855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532) -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
